Mftms13’s Weblog

Can you believe this? This pile of paper work looks twice as big in real life. I really have to hand it to secretaries, clerks or anyone that has to deal with paper work on a daily basis.  Here’s a breakdown 20% Plaintiffs medicals 20% Settlement actions 15% failed trial actions. This concluded the courts legal actions as Defendants’ trial failed. 15% filing for relief and the remaining 30% would be Defendants’ filing of irrelevant issues.

The first 40% are the pivotal points of complaint, being medicals, injuries and the use of claims for awards to settle this suit then a refusal to release the awards to the proper persons for which awards were had. Huh, damn it, man!

Here’s the deal.  Our 1998 and 1999 settled awards millions or billions are held from us. This being the fact it’s easy to understand that anything done by us to gain relief will always be short of what will be needed. Has ever a hate crime been, this is it. Even the courts are confused at this point and can not be trusted to even give advise.

The acting judge’s advice to a recent dismissal was contact the judge over the settlement to ask of our claims and what type of action may be required of us.  A letter to judge Graves  caused a visit by the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation. This agency claims to only work on behalf of the state.  We have been forbidden to ever contact the judge who settled our claims. Additionally, we were warned never to file any lawsuit against those who have commented the crimes alleged against my family.  The final threat, I mean order was amended early 2009.

In response to the actual events ” the facts ” in that the Mississippi courts are said to make use of cosmetic law.  Having five volumes that show settlement of real world actions, all in my family’s name. The present understanding a degree of wrong by the court with the question as who receives any  request in review of these matters?  There’s  more.  Was all this for nothing as the claims are stated still pending under Judge Green.  Having never actually been transferred to DeLaughter.  Any present action to the present logic of this court is as follows or is it “Petition” the court via Judge Coleman who has replaced DeLaughter handling civil matters?

UPDATE:

IN MEMORY:  MORRIS DEAN 2-9-02

Generally, when the state has evidence or even when it doesn’t the court and prosecutors will hang your ass good for little to no reasons and as a citizen of this state we all know this. Case in point if the courts thought we were wrong in these matters we would be put under the jail which in this case would take the place of the intended grave. As these sites are limited to space we’ll remove the documents in the header here to post the complaint, answer, and reply. It’s the same old story.  Defendants state that the last action on our claims were a dismissal of Judge Graves by a January 15th, 1998 Order for failure to complete discovery. To bad that’s a lie worth millions.  Countless documents show actions of settling well after said Graves’ order even an Order denying motion to dismiss our claims in which awards were gained by Judge Graves.  For whatever reason [ lies ] the court has not yet sent the decision of the court to dismiss by an order having nothing to do with actions against attorneys presently we will post that Order as soon as it arrives for now check out the latest action of extortion.

After settlements of Vicksburg and all others with regards to the only claims before this court the plot has definitely thickened. What gives here as a defense attorney acting as attorney for the plaintiffs in transfer of awards from Judge Green and Graves to Judge Bobby DeLaughter. Now don’t try this at home boys and girls because it’s as bad as all other actions which the court has engaged in regarding the ( for lack of ) stealing of awards. Perhaps the only magic here is black magic. So hocus pocus unto you from that Magical Jurisdiction known as the Hinds County Court, ya’ll come back now ya hear.

With all attempts to dismiss not once have defendants mention the fact that the Marie claims were settled, that the Marie claims were the only valid claims after a failed trial or that defendants had already help their selves to a good portion of the settlement offer severed with the Marie claims. Its probably something I’ll go through again addressing a frivolous motion to dismiss. 

This matter has gone through three federal courts and appeal. Since the settlement once had would not be dismissed for certain as the court held awards of the very same claims. Each dismissal was without prejudice except for Judge Green’s transfer to DeLaughter who claims to have dismissed with prejudice. The motion to dismiss has always stated the same reasons for dismissal. The motion is no more than an incomplete pile of insulting bull shit starting with the following and latest reasons first.

1. Defendants remind the court of how long it’s been since the release as though no action was ever taken on behalf of these plaintiffs claims or the unlawful seizure of their home warrants no action.

2. The fact that other courts have dismissed other attempts to have issues of releasing awards for demanded relief.

3. That with countless items of documented evidence submitted that the Marie complaint is vague, unintelligible and unsupported with regards to alleged denial of due process of unspecified unconstitutional acts.

4. Defendants continue to state however that these plaintiffs have sued multiple Defendants Vicksburg Chemical and Cedar Corporation along with some insanity regarding diversity jurisdiction to the given facts.

5. That the evidence which clearly shows direct actions by state actors fails under color of law to prove any constitutional denials.

6. As the court maintains the settled awards and that the actions against defendants are time barred regarding limitations. And that during a full blown election year that Judge Pickering found the Plaintiffs’ claims which as I have stated were already settled to be frivolous as well as providing no jurisdiction. 

7. In instances when a greater effort to combat the defendants crock of shit occurred the court found it impossible to discern the complaint against defendants but never the awards.

8. That the courts of Louisiana would allow the Gaylord toxic release to be a class action after all the attorneys failure to secure any awards by law.

This is the extent of the latest reasons and now I’ll move to the defendants first reasons which make as much sense as their recent ones. Even if these reasons were true the actions stated occurred in a time when the joinder class action mass tort was uncertain and all attorneys knew was to get this money the Maries must be kept away from the court. The reasons end by statements that the last action had was January of 1998. Here are those reasons.  Defendants and the court refuse to address the fact that the settlement of claims occurred in August 1998 through February 1999. Long after all reasons given to dismiss the last being January 1998.

1. That the Maries were part of a New Kirk action which failed to deliver a response to request for documents and. 

2. That an order by Judge Graves in January of 1998 dismissed claims and that the court held jurisdiction of these claims or any attempt to revive. i.e. the judge wanted the awards from these claims without the injuries or damage. The letter from attorney Baria to the Judge Graves shows the plot to consolidate our awards to others at an up coming trial which again failed.

Perhaps its better understood why defendants have kept this action out of court. The law being the law it would be very hard not to assume that bribery was involved in any attempt to dismiss these claims or to allow proper actions. The entire matter to exclude the plaintiffs or to do them in was an over kill to a matter better offering relief.

The events related to our exposure are some what lengthy and we would rather tell it to a jury. For the sake of this blog we will try to be as informative as possible to the short version of events. We left a friend’s house in Bogalusa shortly after the release not wanting to go home we went visit family members in Sandy Hook Ms. Later that evening upon returning home we were turned by a road block and spent the night at our family’s house. We returned home Tuesday morning the day after the release. Wednesday it started raining and we started getting sick by Friday with no insurance we sought medical aid through an attorney.  After signing on with the firm we were told that their medical team would not be in town ( Bogalusa ) till the following week and we should seek a doctor on our on till then.

E.R. Bogalusa 10:30 p.m. Sunday 29th, October after signing in things were slow. The place was full of people wanting to see a doctor complaining about exposure. We sat in a place away from everyone trying to keep a steady breathing pace. It wasn’t easy. Our skin was peeling, face red, coughing and couldn’t hardly breath. I remember Robert saying his eyes were burning as were mine and he asked if I saw what he thought he saw. Yep I saw it but why was his feet fuming like that. By 3:00 am. most had gotten tired of waiting on a doctor and left. Other than us there was a young girl maybe 14 who shared a trash can with us to vomit in. When it came our turn to see the doctor everyone had put on gloves, face mask and some had goggles. We were released around 6:30 am. and told we had the flu. Feeling worse than when we got there, we decided to drive to Mississippi looking for help we felt we needed or had not received.

I guess what a person suffers from has to do with where your seen. The first E. R. visit was a look over and a personal opinion. Our examination in Mississippi was somewhat more in depth with the blood work more was known . The extent of exposure was bad after our 2nd, visit there was a 3rd, before seeing the attorneys physician which after more blood work it was affirmed for the third time we had been exposed. Here’s those reports along with one report from 2004. In seeking out an other opinion of our condition an unusual event. Some doctor who was treating others for exposure flipped when he examined us. He wanted to have Robert placed in a hospital in Slidell, Louisiana for 3 months to have his blood filtered and replaced. We have dealt with our condition at that time for over 8 years and fully understand that the doctor dealing with this knew nothing about it other than is was very dangerous and would probably kill us. Just briefly the absorbent ability of N2O4 surpasses any ability to remove it from organs or bone by simply filtering the blood. This doctor became angry and other than medical condition added other comments to his report which always reflects badly on us for not going along.

It was as though he was treating persons for exposure and this real exposure wasn’t as the others and he felt threatened by it. In short as though it might interfere with his pay. Additionally note the fact that the doctor who performed the Colonoscopy, lesion removal does these operations for free.  No I’m kidding this was really a secret operation which was supposed be an examination only. So if you ever find yourself the center of attraction as all eyes are on you just remember there are some people who feel for enough money they can do anything. The bleeding stopped so from what I can tell the operation worked still they could have asked. Our condition is still bad as many symptoms remain there is still hope justice might see us return home, however, the matter of greed and corruption persist.

I knew it wouldn’t be long before those strange orders got published. The original reason for this site was to shed a little light on some problems with Mississippi’s judicial system in one case in particular.  I’ve decided to post copies of significant actions within the court in Civil action 251-98-1061 which was Marie V. Vicksburg et. al. Briefly the facts.

The claims gained an offer in 1998 of $84 million dollars.  Additionally, of what was joined to a massive class action trial which failed the total of awards were maintained by the Marie Claims. It was not Plaintiffs’ greed but rather the Defendants’ which legally placed awards upon the Maries. Judge Graves moved to Supreme Court placed the cause already settled under Judge Tomie Green.  How this was done is unclear, why is obvious.  Plaintiffs’ filed motions for relief in accordance to the case management order and other significant laws state and federal, yet, the motion was denied. The claims have been held since 1999 in violation of every right to relief.

There is little doubt that the awards were tampered with. The complaints and pleas for relief occurred right along with every criminal act since the on set to take the awards. It has been going on a total of 13 years now by an assumption of Plaintiffs’ death. The assumed seems to be desired now and the furtherance of this plot required what is known as magical jurisdiction.  You have to ask questions when you know something is just not right. Why did the court continue to deny relief to this cause which was use to gain the awards?  Why was the Plaintiffs’ right to relief of issues for  their home from unlawful seizure denied?

I would beg to differ the true claims once settled and clear of other parties by law had concluded the actions of this cause before the court. The court at the point of settlement in 1998 or 1999 should have provided relief to the injured party. In this case the destruction of the Plaintiffs’ home warrants relief.